<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Putting My Money Where My Mouth Is&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.romancingtheblog.com/blog/2007/05/04/putting-my-money-where-my-mouth-is/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.romancingtheblog.com/blog/2007/05/04/putting-my-money-where-my-mouth-is/</link>
	<description>What's hip, what's now, what's tomorrow in the romance genre world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 20:26:04 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bettye Griffin</title>
		<link>http://www.romancingtheblog.com/blog/2007/05/04/putting-my-money-where-my-mouth-is/comment-page-1/#comment-17310</link>
		<dc:creator>Bettye Griffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 18:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.romancingtheblog.com/blog/2007/05/02/putting-my-money-where-my-mouth-is/#comment-17310</guid>
		<description>I spoke to representatives of Borders, and they maintain that their customers like to have African-American fiction shelved separately, and that is why they do it.  

I personally am uncomfortable with the idea of black authors like myself being shelved separately (I don&#039;t think this is why all those people fighting for equality had in mind when they were attacked, beaten, and sometimes killed.)  But the issue of shelving is a big one, and many authors have problems with it.  I resent having my novels placed under the heading of &quot;Street Lit,&quot; and I also resent having my mainstream women&#039;s fiction classified as &quot;Romance.&quot;  I write romance, yes; but I also write mainstream women&#039;s fiction, and they are two different things.

Anyway, I also can&#039;t argue with Borders for giving their customers what they want.  That&#039;s why they&#039;re in business.  I have to wonder if that is why I&#039;ve noticed more African-American customers in Borders than I do at Barnes &amp; Noble (I have set up the majority of my book signings at Borders, who has a very strong presence here in the Chicago area).

Even though I prefer the shelving practices of Barnes &amp; Noble (*all* the fiction is alphabetical by author, with certain newer titles set up on the &quot;African-American fiction&quot; display table), I have to promote where the people who are most likely to buy my books shop.

Bettye Griffin
www.bettyegriffin.com
www.chew-the-fat-with-Bettye.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spoke to representatives of Borders, and they maintain that their customers like to have African-American fiction shelved separately, and that is why they do it.  </p>
<p>I personally am uncomfortable with the idea of black authors like myself being shelved separately (I don&#8217;t think this is why all those people fighting for equality had in mind when they were attacked, beaten, and sometimes killed.)  But the issue of shelving is a big one, and many authors have problems with it.  I resent having my novels placed under the heading of &#8220;Street Lit,&#8221; and I also resent having my mainstream women&#8217;s fiction classified as &#8220;Romance.&#8221;  I write romance, yes; but I also write mainstream women&#8217;s fiction, and they are two different things.</p>
<p>Anyway, I also can&#8217;t argue with Borders for giving their customers what they want.  That&#8217;s why they&#8217;re in business.  I have to wonder if that is why I&#8217;ve noticed more African-American customers in Borders than I do at Barnes &amp; Noble (I have set up the majority of my book signings at Borders, who has a very strong presence here in the Chicago area).</p>
<p>Even though I prefer the shelving practices of Barnes &amp; Noble (*all* the fiction is alphabetical by author, with certain newer titles set up on the &#8220;African-American fiction&#8221; display table), I have to promote where the people who are most likely to buy my books shop.</p>
<p>Bettye Griffin<br />
<a href="http://www.bettyegriffin.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.bettyegriffin.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.chew-the-fat-with-Bettye.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.chew-the-fat-with-Bettye.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monica</title>
		<link>http://www.romancingtheblog.com/blog/2007/05/04/putting-my-money-where-my-mouth-is/comment-page-1/#comment-17270</link>
		<dc:creator>Monica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 13:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.romancingtheblog.com/blog/2007/05/02/putting-my-money-where-my-mouth-is/#comment-17270</guid>
		<description>You know, I was getting discouraged and Karen Scott predictably smacked me upside the head and pointed me to your post.  

Maybe the banging of my head upside the concrete wall for frickin&#039; years was worth something more than a headache :razz:.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I was getting discouraged and Karen Scott predictably smacked me upside the head and pointed me to your post.  </p>
<p>Maybe the banging of my head upside the concrete wall for frickin&#8217; years was worth something more than a headache <img src='http://www.romancingtheblog.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':razz:' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tara Marie</title>
		<link>http://www.romancingtheblog.com/blog/2007/05/04/putting-my-money-where-my-mouth-is/comment-page-1/#comment-17269</link>
		<dc:creator>Tara Marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 13:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.romancingtheblog.com/blog/2007/05/02/putting-my-money-where-my-mouth-is/#comment-17269</guid>
		<description>Monica--It might have taken me a while, but really--I did finally get it.  :grin:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Monica&#8211;It might have taken me a while, but really&#8211;I did finally get it.  <img src='http://www.romancingtheblog.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':grin:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monica</title>
		<link>http://www.romancingtheblog.com/blog/2007/05/04/putting-my-money-where-my-mouth-is/comment-page-1/#comment-17268</link>
		<dc:creator>Monica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 13:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.romancingtheblog.com/blog/2007/05/02/putting-my-money-where-my-mouth-is/#comment-17268</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Tara Marie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Tara Marie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tara Marie</title>
		<link>http://www.romancingtheblog.com/blog/2007/05/04/putting-my-money-where-my-mouth-is/comment-page-1/#comment-17262</link>
		<dc:creator>Tara Marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 12:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.romancingtheblog.com/blog/2007/05/02/putting-my-money-where-my-mouth-is/#comment-17262</guid>
		<description>Ms. Smith, you&#039;ve explained why I had a hard time understanding the complaints against an AA section, but finally I realized it&#039;s not about marketability, it&#039;s about right and wrong.  Ms Glass uses following definition...&lt;i&gt;The definition of discrimination is “treatment or consideration based on class or category rather than individual merit”&lt;/i&gt;.

African American authors are not given a CHOICE in stores that segregate, their work is held separate because of the color of their skin.  

If we don&#039;t tolerate it in restaurants and schools we shouldn&#039;t in bookstores.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ms. Smith, you&#8217;ve explained why I had a hard time understanding the complaints against an AA section, but finally I realized it&#8217;s not about marketability, it&#8217;s about right and wrong.  Ms Glass uses following definition&#8230;<i>The definition of discrimination is “treatment or consideration based on class or category rather than individual merit”</i>.</p>
<p>African American authors are not given a CHOICE in stores that segregate, their work is held separate because of the color of their skin.  </p>
<p>If we don&#8217;t tolerate it in restaurants and schools we shouldn&#8217;t in bookstores.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seressia Glass: Blog Me &#187; Following Up on being a black romance writer</title>
		<link>http://www.romancingtheblog.com/blog/2007/05/04/putting-my-money-where-my-mouth-is/comment-page-1/#comment-17247</link>
		<dc:creator>Seressia Glass: Blog Me &#187; Following Up on being a black romance writer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 00:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.romancingtheblog.com/blog/2007/05/02/putting-my-money-where-my-mouth-is/#comment-17247</guid>
		<description>[...] Romancing the blog has a post covering the topic.  Monica Jackson also blogs about it.  Actually, this writer has been blogging about the subject for years, and I can certainly see why she feels she&#8217;s pounding her head bloody against a locked door. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Romancing the blog has a post covering the topic.  Monica Jackson also blogs about it.  Actually, this writer has been blogging about the subject for years, and I can certainly see why she feels she&#8217;s pounding her head bloody against a locked door. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seressia</title>
		<link>http://www.romancingtheblog.com/blog/2007/05/04/putting-my-money-where-my-mouth-is/comment-page-1/#comment-17246</link>
		<dc:creator>Seressia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 00:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.romancingtheblog.com/blog/2007/05/02/putting-my-money-where-my-mouth-is/#comment-17246</guid>
		<description>The second definition of racism according to the American Heritage Dictionary is &quot;Discrimination or prejudice based on race.&quot;  The definition of discrimination is &quot;treatment or consideration based on class or category rather than individual merit&quot;

So clumping a group of books together, in which the sole defining characteristic is the author&#039;s color/or the imprint&#039;s focus, can be argued as being racism.  Especially when you consider other ethnic groups are not separated out in this manner in Borders or Waldenbooks.  Where&#039;s the Asian fiction section?  Shouldn&#039;t the Native American romances be in the Native American section?  All the regencies in the British history section?  Where&#039;s the fiction with Maori protagonists?

Again there is an assumption that all black people are going to buy any black book because a black person wrote it, so why not put them all together.  This is simply not the case, especially when it comes to genre fiction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The second definition of racism according to the American Heritage Dictionary is &#8220;Discrimination or prejudice based on race.&#8221;  The definition of discrimination is &#8220;treatment or consideration based on class or category rather than individual merit&#8221;</p>
<p>So clumping a group of books together, in which the sole defining characteristic is the author&#8217;s color/or the imprint&#8217;s focus, can be argued as being racism.  Especially when you consider other ethnic groups are not separated out in this manner in Borders or Waldenbooks.  Where&#8217;s the Asian fiction section?  Shouldn&#8217;t the Native American romances be in the Native American section?  All the regencies in the British history section?  Where&#8217;s the fiction with Maori protagonists?</p>
<p>Again there is an assumption that all black people are going to buy any black book because a black person wrote it, so why not put them all together.  This is simply not the case, especially when it comes to genre fiction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa</title>
		<link>http://www.romancingtheblog.com/blog/2007/05/04/putting-my-money-where-my-mouth-is/comment-page-1/#comment-17245</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 23:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.romancingtheblog.com/blog/2007/05/02/putting-my-money-where-my-mouth-is/#comment-17245</guid>
		<description>Deborah Smith said, &quot;*And*, while yes, some readers are looking for a specific author, the marketing rationale is that “If you like this author’s book then maybe you’ll like books by these similar authors.” I seriously doubt AA romances are being shelved separately from other romances due to any form of racism.&quot;

See the problem comes from is if the authors only similiarity is their skin color, then that can be seen as racist hiding behind the excuse of marketability.  It&#039;s being called niche marketing but it&#039;s not being based of the content of the story but the color of the author.

Even if you don&#039;t see it as racist then see the problem is the authors and readers voices aren&#039;t being heard. In the simpliest terms they are asking why can&#039;t my book be with the general romance section or erotica, or paranormal, etc.? 

Kimani Press is an imprint of Harlequin so why isn&#039;t these books on the same shevles as a Blaze, Desire, American Romance, and all the other imprints and lines they own?

Okay, if you don&#039;t see that as a problem then ask is the way AA authors are marketed(clumped in alphabetical order no thought to genre) helping or hindering sells?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deborah Smith said, &#8220;*And*, while yes, some readers are looking for a specific author, the marketing rationale is that “If you like this author’s book then maybe you’ll like books by these similar authors.” I seriously doubt AA romances are being shelved separately from other romances due to any form of racism.&#8221;</p>
<p>See the problem comes from is if the authors only similiarity is their skin color, then that can be seen as racist hiding behind the excuse of marketability.  It&#8217;s being called niche marketing but it&#8217;s not being based of the content of the story but the color of the author.</p>
<p>Even if you don&#8217;t see it as racist then see the problem is the authors and readers voices aren&#8217;t being heard. In the simpliest terms they are asking why can&#8217;t my book be with the general romance section or erotica, or paranormal, etc.? </p>
<p>Kimani Press is an imprint of Harlequin so why isn&#8217;t these books on the same shevles as a Blaze, Desire, American Romance, and all the other imprints and lines they own?</p>
<p>Okay, if you don&#8217;t see that as a problem then ask is the way AA authors are marketed(clumped in alphabetical order no thought to genre) helping or hindering sells?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claudia</title>
		<link>http://www.romancingtheblog.com/blog/2007/05/04/putting-my-money-where-my-mouth-is/comment-page-1/#comment-17244</link>
		<dc:creator>Claudia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 22:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.romancingtheblog.com/blog/2007/05/02/putting-my-money-where-my-mouth-is/#comment-17244</guid>
		<description>I recently filled out one of those notorious Borders surveys and wonder about the accuracy of the AA book research. I never told Borders my race and don&#039;t know if they sent copies to all Borders Reward memebers or if they tracked the fact that I make AA book purchases.

The survey was described as being general, but it seemed like 90-95% of the questions were about AA books. I think it would have been very tempting for anyone to give affirmative answers to questions like the ones about the convenience of and special cultural/ethnic acknowledgement in having  separate shelves. There was even a question about whether respondents thought an AA children&#039;s book section was a great idea... There were also questions about coupons, promotions, bookclubs and other issues in relation to AA books and AA readers.

I said I liked convenience, but always left comments emphasizing that I like consistency even more. I was really irritated to find Kimanis on an endcap facing a little visited corner of my store when everyone was looking for Kimanis in the AA and romance section.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently filled out one of those notorious Borders surveys and wonder about the accuracy of the AA book research. I never told Borders my race and don&#8217;t know if they sent copies to all Borders Reward memebers or if they tracked the fact that I make AA book purchases.</p>
<p>The survey was described as being general, but it seemed like 90-95% of the questions were about AA books. I think it would have been very tempting for anyone to give affirmative answers to questions like the ones about the convenience of and special cultural/ethnic acknowledgement in having  separate shelves. There was even a question about whether respondents thought an AA children&#8217;s book section was a great idea&#8230; There were also questions about coupons, promotions, bookclubs and other issues in relation to AA books and AA readers.</p>
<p>I said I liked convenience, but always left comments emphasizing that I like consistency even more. I was really irritated to find Kimanis on an endcap facing a little visited corner of my store when everyone was looking for Kimanis in the AA and romance section.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.romancingtheblog.com/blog/2007/05/04/putting-my-money-where-my-mouth-is/comment-page-1/#comment-17242</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 19:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.romancingtheblog.com/blog/2007/05/02/putting-my-money-where-my-mouth-is/#comment-17242</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s a mistake to assume bookstores are either condescending or racist when they shelve AA books together. As a small press publisher I&#039;ve learned a lot about the way wholesalers and booksellers do business: It&#039;s all about branding, about types, genres, and easily identifiable niches. There&#039;s soooo much competition for readers&#039; attention and time. Anything that makes it easier for readers to find a certain specific type of book promotes sales. So it&#039;s my guess that bookstores are mostly concerned with providing their AA customers (including non-AA readers who want to read AA fiction) with a simple go-to place to find it. *And*, while yes, some readers are looking for a specific author, the marketing rationale is that &quot;If you like this author&#039;s book then maybe you&#039;ll like books by these similar authors.&quot; I seriously doubt AA romances are being shelved separately from other romances due to any form of racism. It&#039;s always about what sells the most books the fastest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s a mistake to assume bookstores are either condescending or racist when they shelve AA books together. As a small press publisher I&#8217;ve learned a lot about the way wholesalers and booksellers do business: It&#8217;s all about branding, about types, genres, and easily identifiable niches. There&#8217;s soooo much competition for readers&#8217; attention and time. Anything that makes it easier for readers to find a certain specific type of book promotes sales. So it&#8217;s my guess that bookstores are mostly concerned with providing their AA customers (including non-AA readers who want to read AA fiction) with a simple go-to place to find it. *And*, while yes, some readers are looking for a specific author, the marketing rationale is that &#8220;If you like this author&#8217;s book then maybe you&#8217;ll like books by these similar authors.&#8221; I seriously doubt AA romances are being shelved separately from other romances due to any form of racism. It&#8217;s always about what sells the most books the fastest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
